The Court Case

Supreme Court on La Amistad

Author: Allison Khan

As La Amistad arrived in the United States the question of what to do with the remaining people on board became a prominent question. Since the Slave Trade was abolished in both the Unites States and Spain, they technically had to be declared “free citizens.” However, many people at the time did not agree with this sentiment and thus the case was taken to the Supreme Court where the Mende (African) people were represented by John Quincy Adams. In this case, Adams purported that the Africans were being wrongfully enslaved under international law, and should therefore be considered free (Nester 140). On the other hand, the appellants (represented by Henry Gilpin) purported that the insurrection was somewhat unlawful and unjustified. Over the course of two years the case finally reached a decision, and in a 7-1 majority vote the Mende people were declared free. The majority decision was given by Justice Joseph Story, and sided with the argument presented by Adams in their enslavement being wrong under international law (United States v. The Amistad). This case was definitely a watershed moment not just for the people of La Amistad, but also for the beginnings of civil rights movements in places like America. Through this case one can see a dramatic change over an extensive period of time as in years prior (during the active Slave Trade) these peoples who most likely have been declared enslaved. Although this was a small step in the larger fight for civil rights for Africans still illegally being captured and enslaved, it demonstrates a willingness to fight back both physically and legally. With all this in mind, this Supreme Court case provides insight to the broader view of civil liberties and civil rights for African peoples in places like Europe and the Americas.


Nester, William. “The Masters Nightmare.” In The Age of Jackson and the Art of American Power,

1815-1848, 137-146. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2013.


United States v. The Amistad, 40 US 518 (1841) (“the appellees who declared as alleged ‘slaves’ were

wrongfully captured and sold, therefore declaring them free”)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sierra Leone and the Slave Trade

Image
Sierra Leone on the map Author: Jessica Han Sierra Leone’s slave trade was established all throughout the country. One such noted establishment was Bunce Island, which was located about twenty miles north of the Sierra Leone river (Aldrich, Jane). The British establishment of Bunce Island in Sierra Leone served as what is commonly known as a “slave castle.'' These slave castles would serve as housing units for slaves before they would be shipped out to different slave ports for sale. Bunce Island opened as a slave castle in 1670 and operated until 1807. In another article by the Hartford Courant, they argue that “tens of thousands of kidnapped Africans from that region were shipped through the facility and onto the Caribbean Islands and the colonies of South Carolina and Georgia'' (Hartford Courant). Although thousands of Africans, most likely free men and women were kidnapped. The constant demand for slaves did not stop the surge in kidnappings of freedmen and women. B
Read more

The Consequences of the Slave Trade Concerning La Amistad: “La Amistad’s Orphans”

Image
Drawing of the Deck of La Amistad Date and Artist unknown Author: Shanna Campbell "A child's experience of enslavement is qualitatively different from that of an adult for a number of reasons, not least of which is that even when they are ostensibly free, as children they remained dependents and wards of others" (Lawrence, 89). The stories of children who were in enslaved families are often overlooked for the stories of the enslaved adults. It can be difficult to get the stories of children of enslaved families during this time, which is why they are often overlooked. However, in the case of La Amistad , due to its high profile, access to details around the children became easier. The Mende children on board La Amistad  were closely tied to the 1839 case, and their freedom also came into question during the trial. Lawrence, in chapter 3 of his book, discusses that children and women were the most vulnerable to "the notion that African slave status must be positioned
Read more